Deceptive fingers? – A new milestone in finger length research!

June 25, 2009

Deceptive fingers? - A new milestone in finger length research!

Deceptive fingers? - A new milestone in finger length research!

Is the 2D:4D finger ratio research misleading?

Czech researchers claim to have found that “previously published results on the 2D:4D ratio are biased by its covariation with finger length”. What are the implications?

Popular magazines in The Netherlands & Germany have picked-up the scoop with tempting titles such as: ‘Finger ratio is misleading’ and ‘Deceptive finger’. But the truth appears to be that those titles could be more misleading: for, likely the new research describes a new milestone in the digit ratio research!

The Czech researchers presented their new research under the title: ‘differences in the 2nd to 4th digit length ratio in humans reflect shifts along the common allometric line‘ – and in the publication they describe the following about their finger findings:

“Sexual differences in 2D : 4D are mainly caused by the shift along the common allometric line with non-zero intercept, which means 2D : 4D necessarily decreases with increasing finger length, and the fact that men have longer fingers than women.”

“We do not claim that the previous results for the finger length ratio are wrong”

“We conclude that previously published results on the 2D : 4D ratio are biased by its covariation with finger length. We strongly recommend regression-based approaches for comparisons of hand shape among different groups.”

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Deceptive fingers? – A new milestone in finger length research!”

  1. Carol Kellogg Says:

    wait till you get to finger length pelvimetry childbirth outcomes.and then allopelvimetry. variation among women


  2. […] What are the essentials of the Czech research? The Czech researchers claim that the fundamentals of the male-female differences in 2D:4D finger length ratios can be related to male-female differences in finger length. Men usually have longer fingers (larger hands) than women – and there appears to be a negative correlation between finger length in general and the 2D:4D finger ratio. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s